Nanning Evening News (Reporter Li Zongwen) Recently, the first play of the 16th China Drama Festival — — Zhuang drama "the baise uprising" appeared in Fuzhou Workers’ Cultural Palace. The play is a project supported by the Propaganda Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Party Committee, and was created and arranged by Guangxi Theatre Academy.

　　The baise uprising, a Zhuang drama, set in the baise uprising, Guangxi in 1929, tells the glorious practice of the Communist Party of China (CPC)’s "armed separation of workers and peasants" in minority areas of Guangxi. The combination of epic and drama and the beautiful singing of Zhuang opera left a deep impression on the audience. The China Theatre Festival Organizing Committee also awarded the 16th China Drama and the 16th China Theatre Festival Excellent Drama Award to Guangxi Theatre Academy.

　　The 16th China Drama Festival, with the theme of "Pursuing Dreams and Inheriting Classics in the New Era", was held in Fuzhou from October 26th to November 12th. Thirty outstanding plays performed by 30 art groups and units across the country met the audience, covering 24 art forms.　　

　　Fang min

　　Take the bus, subway and water bus, and only scan one yard; Go to the hospital, exercise in the park, and eat in the dining hall for the elderly, and only scan one code … … Recently, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province launched "Yuhang One Code Link", which provided convenience for users. Break through the multiple "code" barriers between various departments, platforms and mobile phone applications, so that multiple scenes only need to display one code, reflecting the practical results of digital reform.

　　Problems are the driving force for reform and development. In the investigation, Yuhang District Data Resources Management Bureau found that it was inconvenient for many citizens, especially the elderly, to receive and display codes, so it intensified the reform, simplified complex problems based on the needs of the people, analyzed user behavior from the data aspect, tried its best to provide convenient services, and promoted the construction of "Yuhang One Code Pass". Since the operation of One Code Link, Yuhang has collected about 7.1 million pieces of data in 8 categories and 54 items, focusing on 24 application scenarios such as one-code travel, one-code communication, one-code verification, one-code admission, one-code medical treatment, one-code payment, one-code disability assistance and health declaration. Promote digital reform, always take the hearts of the people as the heart, make public services more inclusive and pay more attention to the sense of experience, and relevant results will better benefit the broad masses.

　　Just scan one code, reflecting the intention of digital reform to benefit the people. After breaking through the data barrier between multiple "codes", Yuhang citizens can travel without worry with one code in hand. No matter doing things, traveling, going to school or starting a business, many fields can be "one code". For example, the smart swimming pool can know the time and state of swimmers in the water in real time by scanning the code, which is of great help to judge whether they are drowning. Going deep into the digital scene of daily life is changing people’s living conditions to a certain extent and making urban life better.

　　Just scan a code to show the government’s determination to improve its governance capacity and level. Promoting digital construction does not mean that the richer the code, the better. In order to realize one code communication, Yuhang District Data Resources Administration took the lead in coordinating 23 departments, including Health and Wellness Bureau, Veterans Affairs Bureau, Audit Office and Civil Affairs Bureau, and opened 26 "codes" to realize the physical integration of digital resources. In addition, Yuhang District has also reduced the construction plans of related codes in seven projects, such as "Mathematical Intelligence CPPCC" (member code), "Push-to-Talk Home Economics" (housekeeping code) and "Comfortable Care for the Aged" (old age code). Promoting digital reform is the proper meaning of building a digital government, and it is also a test of governance ability and efficiency. In this process, actively promoting the process reengineering and model optimization of government governance, and constantly improving the scientific decision-making and service efficiency will certainly help to promote the all-round digital transformation of economy and society through government digital transformation.

　　To achieve efficient governance and smart life, digitalization is only a means, and it is even more critical to promote changes in production methods, lifestyles and governance methods. In a sense, it is a systematic project to apply scientific and technological innovations and optimize public service processes. From the reform of "running at most once" to the construction of one-code communication, the essence is to incite all-field reforms with digitalization as the starting point, and then expand more application scenarios. To further deepen the digital reform, it is necessary to adhere to the guidance of the needs of the masses and use information technology as a means to constantly break down the "data island" and "information barrier", realize internal and external integration, and continuously stimulate the vitality of reform.

　　"One ‘ Code ’ Take the lead. " Some people in Yuhang District Administrative Service Center said that using "Yuhang One Code Link", they felt the ease of one code link, number taking and handling. Facing the future, Yuhang will continue to give full play to the advantages of digital governance, constantly promote technological change, broaden application scenarios, release data dividends, and strive to make people enjoy smarter, more convenient and better public services.

　　(The author is a reporter from Zhejiang Branch of this newspaper)

　　Recently, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and Technology issued "Several Opinions on Standardizing the Use of Relevant Indicators of SCI Papers in Colleges and Universities and Establishing Correct Evaluation Orientation" (hereinafter referred to as "Opinions"), which put forward clear requirements for breaking the "SCI supremacy" of papers.

　　"Colleges and universities should take breaking the paper" ‘SCI first "as a breakthrough, make a small incision and make a big turn, come up with practical and hard moves with strong pertinence and operability, break the" only paper "and establish a correct evaluation orientation." The head of the Science and Technology Department of the Ministry of Education said.

　　The related indexes of SCI papers are directly used for scientific research evaluation, which has great limitations.

　　The General Secretary of the Supreme Leader clearly pointed out at the National Education Conference that it is necessary to deepen the reform of the education system, improve the implementation mechanism of moral education, reverse the unscientific orientation of education evaluation, resolutely overcome the stubborn disease of only grades, only studies, only diplomas, only papers and only hats, and fundamentally solve the baton problem of education evaluation.

　　In recent years, there is a strong voice from all walks of life to break the "SCI supremacy" of papers and optimize academic ecology. "The related indicators of SCI papers have become the core indicators of academic evaluation, professional title evaluation, performance appraisal, talent evaluation, subject evaluation, resource allocation, school ranking, etc., which makes the scientific research work of colleges and universities excessively pursue the related indicators of SCI papers, and even the alienation with the basic goal of publishing the number of SCI papers, high-impact papers and highly cited papers, and scientific and technological innovation has problems such as distorted value pursuit, exaggerated and impetuous style of study and quick success." The "Opinions" pointed out.

　　According to reports, SCI is a widely used index system of scientific and technological documents at home and abroad. Just like the book classification card in the library, as a classified database, it helps scientific and technological workers to consult the latest documents, track academic frontiers and carry out scientific research by counting the research fields, directions and cited frequencies of papers.

　　"The relevant indicators of SCI papers are directly used for scientific research evaluation, which has great limitations." The person in charge of the Science and Technology Department of the Ministry of Education introduced that the essence of SCI is a document indexing system, not an evaluation system, and SCI papers cannot be simply equated with high-level papers. The number of citations reflects the attention of papers, but not the innovation level and substantive contribution. A high number of cited papers means more academic research hotspots. At the same time, the relevant indicators of SCI papers can not fully reflect the contribution of scientific and technological innovation, and are not suitable for the evaluation of technological innovation and achievement transformation.

　　Breaking the "supremacy of SCI" is not to deny SCI, nor to oppose the publication of papers.

　　What are the specific measures to standardize the use of related indicators of SCI papers in colleges and universities? The Opinions lists a "negative list":

　　Improve discipline and school evaluation. Reduce the ranking evaluation of disciplines and schools, and adhere to classification and field evaluation. In the evaluation, we should highlight the quality of innovation and actual contribution, carefully select quantitative indicators such as the number of SCI papers, and guide social institutions to scientifically carry out university evaluation rankings.

　　Optimize the evaluation and employment methods of professional titles (positions). In the evaluation and employment of professional titles (positions), it is necessary to establish a classified evaluation index system, focusing on the suitability of people and posts, and not taking the relevant indicators of SCI papers as the direct basis for the evaluation and employment of professional titles (positions) and as the precondition for the employment of personnel.

　　Reverse the utilitarian tendency of assessment and reward. It is not appropriate for schools to set requirements for academic departments and individuals’ paper indicators, and to remove the direct link between related indicators of SCI papers and resource allocation and performance rewards.

　　Scientifically set quality standards for degree awarding. Guide schools to set reasonable quality standards for degree awarding according to the characteristics of disciplines, and it is not appropriate to take the number of published SCI papers and influencing factors as restrictive conditions for students’ graduation and degree awarding.

　　Establish a correct policy orientation. Colleges and universities and their competent departments should shoulder the responsibility of leading the construction of academic culture, have confidence and determination, and do not accept the letter in public opinion propaganda, and do not publish information such as rankings compiled with the relevant indicators of SCI papers as the core.

　　Then, after the publication of the Opinions, does it mean that papers will no longer be read in various reviews in the future?

　　"This understanding is wrong. The introduction of the document breaks the paper’ SCI supremacy’, not denying SCI, nor opposing the publication of the paper." The person in charge of the Science and Technology Department of the Ministry of Education clearly stated that papers are a manifestation of scientific and technological innovation achievements and an important carrier of academic exchanges. We encourage the publication of academic papers with high level, high quality, innovative value and service contribution. However, in academic evaluation, the innovation level can not be judged simply by the relevant indicators of SCI papers; In all kinds of evaluation activities, it is necessary to rationally use relevant indicators and adopt a comprehensive evaluation method combining qualitative and quantitative methods to guide the evaluation work to highlight scientific spirit, innovative quality and service contribution.

　　Scientific evaluation of academic level, different types of scientific research evaluation do not engage in "one size fits all"

　　How to scientifically evaluate the academic level is a complex problem, and different types of scientific research work can not be "one size fits all".

　　The "Opinions" pointed out that for basic research, papers are the main expression form of results output, and "judging papers by journals" is resolutely abandoned. The evaluation focus is on the innovation level and scientific value of papers, and the relevant indicators of SCI papers are not used as the direct judgment basis; For applied research and technological innovation, the evaluation focuses on the actual contribution to solving key technical problems in production practice, and the actual effect of bringing new technologies, new products and new processes to realize industrial application, instead of taking the paper as a single evaluation basis; Papers are generally not used as evaluation indicators for scientific research and transformation of scientific and technological achievements serving national defense.

　　"We should improve the academic peer evaluation and really play the role of peer experts. In the evaluation, guide experts to not simply replace professional judgment with relevant indicators of SCI papers, provide professional evaluation opinions responsibly, and advocate the establishment of a reputation system for evaluation experts. " The person in charge of the Science and Technology Department of the Ministry of Education introduced that the next step is to greatly reduce the "three evaluations" such as project evaluation, talent evaluation and institutional evaluation. The evaluation indicators and methods should be fully listened to, and the evaluation methods should be representative evaluation, and the application materials should be streamlined and optimized. It is no longer required to fill in the relevant indicators of SCI papers.

　　The reporter noted that some of the Opinions were expressed as "not allowed", such as "not directly linked to SCI related indicators when allocating resources"; Some statements are "inappropriate", such as "it is not appropriate for schools to issue quantitative requirements for related indicators of SCI papers to departments and individuals in performance and employment period assessment".

　　The person in charge of the Science and Technology Department of the Ministry of Education introduced that the use of "no" in terms of utilitarian tendencies means that it is explicitly prohibited and resolutely abandoned existing practices; The use of "inappropriate" is based on the fact that there are still great differences in the development level of colleges and universities in China, and the characteristics and requirements of different disciplines are also different, giving schools certain policy flexibility. For example, in the document, "the number of published SCI papers and impact factors should not be used as restrictive conditions for students’ graduation and degree awarding", which indicates that it is opposed to making rigid regulations at the school level. However, in the process of talent training, it is reasonable for tutors and departments to put forward corresponding requirements for students from the perspective of scientific research ability training and scientific research practice training, which is also in line with the needs of talent training.

　　"The Ministry of Education will inspect the clean-up and rectification of all units through supervision and other means. For units that do not carefully check, refuse to rectify, and have serious problems, they must adopt interviews, informed criticism, etc., and pursue leadership responsibilities. " The head of the Science and Technology Department of the Ministry of Education said. (Reporter Zhang Shuo)